Patent Litigation Defense

Rick Martin is a skilled patent attorney with over 1000 patents issued locally and abroad. U.S. Patent No. 6,560,528 for a fuel injection engine controller, written by Rick Martin, was asserted against the well known Harley Davidson and Kawasaki.

Rick also procured all of Thermark’s international patents for laser engraving. 

Our Law Offices are able to assist you in the areas of:

  • Contingent Patent/Trademark Plaintiff Cases
  • Patent Infringement Defense
  • Patent Reexams

Teamed with other law firms defending patent cases in California, Colorado, Florida, Nebraska, Ohio, Texas, Wisconsin, and Illinois.

Defending such clients as Front Door Software from Absolute Software, a public Canadian firm.

Our offices, through the combined efforts of several attorneys, are able to handle a wide variety of legal matters including patent infringement, copyright infringement, cyber-piracy, trade mark infringement, and theft of trade secrets.

Mi Cocina. Ltd. vs. Mi Cocina. Inc.; Mi Cocina Express. Inc. Case No. IO-cv-00691-PAB-KMT — SettledFederal District Court, District of Colorado Defendant Trademark Infringement

Jetlev Technologies, Inc. vs. Flyboard, Inc.Case No. 12-612323-CV-Middlebrooks/Brannon — Settled Federal District Court, Southern District of Florida Defendant Patent Infringement

Calvin T. Switzer vs. Litex Industries. LTD.; Lowe’s Companies, Inc.; Costco Wholesale Corporation; Amazon.com, Inc.; Shopzeus.com, LLC Case No.I :ll-cv-01174-REB — Settled – Lowes agreed to LicenseFederal District Court, District of Colorado Plaintiff Patent Infringement

Lloyd S. Riddle vs. Julius Sghiatti; Cuffsox, LLC Case No. I:10-cv-02198-CMA-BNB — Settled Federal District Court, District of Colorado Defendant Patent Infringement

Spam Arrest, LLC vs. Rhino Software, Inc.; Digiportal Software. Inc.; Boxbe. Inc.; Sendio. Inc. Case No. 3:10-CV-669-WMC — Settled — ReExam Filed on U.S. Patent No. RE 40,992Federal District Court, Western District of Wisconsin Defendant Patent Infringement (reexam filed 2011)

Fusion Specialties, LLC. v. China Network Leader, Inc., d/b/a CNL MannequinsCase No. 12-cv-00009-CMA-CMT — Settled — ReExam Filed on U.S. Patent No. 6,705,794 Federal District Court, District of ColoradoDefendant Patent Infringement

Absolute Software. Inc.; Absolute Software Corporation vs. World Computer Security Corporation. Front Door Software CorporationCase No. 1 :09-cv-00 142-L Y — Settled — ReExam Filed on U.S. Patent No. 6,300,863 Federal District Court, Western District of Texas, Austin DivisionDefendant Patent and Trademark Infringement (reexam filed 2010)

Alan Silver vs. Panasonic Corporation of North America; HM Electronics. Inc.; Muzak. LLC Case No. 07-cv-60772-DIMITROULEAS — SettledFederal District Court, Southern District of Florida Plaintiff Patent Infringement

Bryan C. McIntire vs. Sunrise Specialty CompanyCase No. 2:11-CV-02495-LK.K-CK.D — Won Summary Judgment Non-infringement Federal District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDefendent Patent Infringement

Shieldmark, LLC. vs. Creative Safety Supply, LLC.Case No. 1:12-cv-00221-CAB – Settled – Reexam filed on U.S. Pat. No. 8,088,480Federal District Court, Northern District of Ohio Defendant Patent and Trademark Infringement

Golight, Inc. vs. Walmart Stores, Inc.355 F.3d 1327 — Won Trial, 2 Appeals and $800,000 Judgment Federal District Court, District of ColoradoPlaintiff Patent Infringement

Aerostream, LLC. v. Artie Zabel (Septicairaid)Case No. 2:12-cv-00190 — Settled — ReExam Filed on U.S. Patent No. 7,264,727 Federal District Court, Eastern District of WisconsinDefendant Patent Infringement

Daritech, Inc. v. Green Source Automation, LLC.Case No. 1:11-cv-00156-BAM — Settled — 2 ReExams Filed on U.S. Patent No. 6,443,094 Federal District Court, District of CaliforniaDefendant Patent Infringement